|
|||||||
| Audio Software VST, DX, AU.... plug-in instrumenti i efekti, modularni sintovi i dizajn modularne sinteze, semplovanje, semplovi i sample libraries diskusije, koje sekvencere, editore, plug-inse koristite. Da li je bolji Sonar ili Cubase? Sound Forge ili WaveLab?.. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Ivan Lekic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kraljevo
Posts: 3,245
|
Dobre strane VST3 u odnosu na VST2:
- plugins are able to shut down as soon as there's nothing to compute, thus saving CPU power (massively, under certain circumstances) - they are always 64bit compatible - they are able to scale to a multi-channel track-format automatically - side-chain options (!!!) - dynamically assignable outputs in case of VSTi's - more that one internal MIDI-port in case of VSTi's (... something other formats are missing dreadfully) - automation options are more consistent, the automation itself is sample-accurate Lose strane VST3: - no FXB/FXP-files anymore, which makes it much harder to organize and to migrate setups to another system - no customized folder structure for organizing the plugins' DLLs - no true surround processing (with linked side-chains and/or controls for L/R, Ls/Rs and so on, just dumb multi-mono processing) BTW. Uostalom ko pati za dx pluginovima i danas ih mozes koristiti , i uvek ces moci .. u svakom najnovijem daw-u , dobri stari FFX-4 |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 48 kanala rekorder sa VST podrskom za iPad | Moritz | Computer Hardware | 5 | 19-01-2012 10:51 AM |
| Steinberg V-Stack | alen | Audio Software | 13 | 11-03-2009 07:07 AM |
| Steinberg id controller | Ad Fines | Computer Hardware | 4 | 26-12-2004 07:37 PM |