RME 9632 ili emu1820M

[MD]

Originally Posted by Oggy

Mozes jos razmisliti i o Lynx One kartici, ona je bolja i od RME i od EMU

I PUNO SKUPLJA

Ma kažem, ne tražim preamp nikakav,, ni veći broj kanala za manju paru, već sam kvalitet konvertera koji bi radili za sada.
Služio bi terratec , možda, no nije stvar u "služenju". Već pomaku naprijed u kvaliteti zvuka.


Znači kažeš, da su i konverteri emu i rme-a tu negdje po kvaliteti?

Hm, onda se čini EMU pametniji izbor.
Očekivao sam po priči da su RME konverteri uistinu primjetljivo bolji.


Hm, ipak čini se da nisam jedini koji razmislja o odnosu ove dvije kartice.
Evo jedna kritika za emu:

short statement by matthias from rme at the rme-newsgroup:

"The HDSP 9632 not only has excellent drivers, but also excellent analog I/O. While the 1820m has a few dBs more on paper, in real world you won't ever run into a situation where you have any advantage of it. Your sources are all too noisy.

Also the 1820m has zero (0) jitter reduction. Make sure to never (!) use that box locked to external clocks. Conversion will immediately be worse than the one of the 9632 (which uses SteadyClock jitter suppression).

And don't use the 1820m via ADAT - the ADAT input uses a non-ADAT compliant optical receiver, which does not operate reliable."

Hm..