Steinberg prestaje sa podrskom za VST 2

[STUDIOTON]

Ubuduce samo vst 3

Steinberg Media Technologies has announced that they will no longer continue to develop and maintain the VST 2 software interface but focus efforts entirely on the Software Development Kit (SDK) development of VST 3. All Steinberg host applications will remain VST 2 compatible.
"After introducing the SDK of version 3 to the VST community five years ago, we believe it's time that VST 2 slowly comes to an end," remarks Timo Wildenhain, product marketing manager at Steinberg. "VST 3 reflects today's technological advancements and meanwhile a considerable number of VST hosts and plug-ins support VST 3."

[branoy]

tako su pree vst2 izbacili dx , sto je velika steta, kako dobrih starih plugina ima i to sve u dx , ja za to instaliram te starije DAW, , al ipak izbaciti i vst2? ne kontam , lose to rade,, mesto da moze sve i dx , dxi, vst2 , , to bi bio pun pogodak, sve radi, jer sve i jesu plugini svaki na svoj nacin, sta fali ih citati?

[STUDIOTON]

Dobre strane VST3 u odnosu na VST2:

- plugins are able to shut down as soon as there's nothing to compute, thus saving CPU power (massively, under certain circumstances)
- they are always 64bit compatible
- they are able to scale to a multi-channel track-format automatically
- side-chain options (!!!)
- dynamically assignable outputs in case of VSTi's
- more that one internal MIDI-port in case of VSTi's (... something other formats are missing dreadfully)
- automation options are more consistent, the automation itself is sample-accurate

Lose strane VST3:

- no FXB/FXP-files anymore, which makes it much harder to organize and to migrate setups to another system
- no customized folder structure for organizing the plugins' DLLs
- no true surround processing (with linked side-chains and/or controls for L/R, Ls/Rs and so on, just dumb multi-mono processing)

BTW. Uostalom ko pati za dx pluginovima i danas ih mozes koristiti , i uvek ces moci .. u svakom najnovijem daw-u , dobri stari FFX-4

[branoy]

ma nije to meni to kad ja tako moram doci do dx, a da mi nisu ovamo na listi gde su efekti i instrumenti kao i svi,, u sonara fino pise DirectX i udjes i svi tu,

drugo, ja i ne koristim nesto te vst3, udjem na prvi vst2 blizi mi, kad imas procesora, ne vidim nesto specijalno potrebu za njim, a sve jaci i jaci racunari,

msm sve to ok, al malo brzaju sa tim vst3, kao i oni u pro tools 11, samo AXX, ok, al onda nece neko kupit il uzet creksovan taj isti daw , nego ce koristiti i dalje stari provereni,, itd


taj vst3 je trebao se pravit u vreme pentium 4,

[STUDIOTON]

Originally Posted by branoy

msm sve to ok, al malo brzaju sa tim vst3

O cemu pricas brzaju? Vst3 je tu vec 5 godina.. nista oni ne brzaju, samo prestaju sa podrskom za vst2, sto je i logicno, 64 daw preuzima primat

[branoy]

al neprimetno za vecinu,

Ok , , ti se radujes da samo imas vst3 u cubesu, ja ne.

[silicon science]

Originally Posted by branoy

ma nije to meni to kad ja tako moram doci do dx, a da mi nisu ovamo na listi gde su efekti i instrumenti kao i svi,, u sonara fino pise DirectX i udjes i svi tu,

drugo, ja i ne koristim nesto te vst3, udjem na prvi vst2 blizi mi, kad imas procesora, ne vidim nesto specijalno potrebu za njim, a sve jaci i jaci racunari,

msm sve to ok, al malo brzaju sa tim vst3, kao i oni u pro tools 11, samo AXX, ok, al onda nece neko kupit il uzet creksovan taj isti daw , nego ce koristiti i dalje stari provereni,, itd


taj vst3 je trebao se pravit u vreme pentium 4,

:ro tfl::ba nghead:

[Sky Net]

Samo neka razvijaju, neka se usavrsavaju, neka ide tehnologija gdje i treba da ide..i neka prave sto bolje zastite i konacno stanu u kraj pirateriji..lijepi eLicencer i iLok.

[STUDIOTON]

I na cubase 10 sta je problem.. Vst2 ces moci koristiti
Da probam stvarno mislim da treba da probam , mozda si u pravu, hvala ti sto si mi otvorio oci, ovaj usi

[Jan]

Jel vi to ka?ete da Cubase 7 superiornije sabira od Cubase 5 ?