Adi
28-05-2006, 06:09 PM
Evo dva mesta gde sam nasao (a ima i cak vise na netu koji tvrde isto), u poredjenju Shure SM58 i Behringera XM8500, da SM58 nema skoro nikakvih prednosti u odnosu na XM8500, i da je cak u nekim stvarima XM8500 i u prednosti, kao sto je naprimer frekvencijski odziv itd.
Sta mislite o tome. Pa ako je tako onda je varijanta XM8500 daleko povoljnija, to moze biti korisno ako niste pri vecoj kinti, ili samo dobar EPP (reklama).
Evo tekstova:
Prvi tester kaze:
The next thing I tried was comparing it to a Shure SM58. I swapped from mic to mic and asked the crowd which they preferred. Those who could tell the difference preferred the XM8500! There wasn't a lot in it. The XM8500 definitely had a little more bottom end and perhaps wasn't quite as bright as the SM58. I would say that the XM8500 has a flatter frequency response than the SM58. The SM58 rolls off a bit of the bottom end and has a little presence boost. The XM8500 was also slightly louder and needed less gain on the mixer than the SM58
After comparing it with the Shure SM58, I pulled out my Shure Beta58 - my usual stage mic. The Beta58 was brighter (as I would have expected) but one didn't sound better than the other - they were just different. The crowd were divided between which sounded better. I guess it's just down to personal preference!
The final test was to have four XM8500s plugged in simultaneously. I ran the whole workshop on the Behringer mics. One thing I noticed was that they didn't feedback easily - certainly less than the SM58s I use. This mic was surely too good to be true!
Drugi tester kaze:
"I also tested the microphones I owned by comparing them with a B&K reference condenser microphone, and since I didn't have access to an anechoic chamber, I had to resort to testing them in my garden. It was the closest environment that I could get to an acoustic-free field, although my neighbours must have been puzzled at the pink noise wafting through the air. Still, it was great fun testing these microphones, which I did by looking at the transfer function between the reference B&K mic and my own microphones.
"The two mikes have to be placed as close as possible to each other with pink noise blasted at them from a hi-fi speaker, which is positioned about one meter away. In this way, the frequency response of the loudspeaker enclosure doesn't matter, providing that it can reproduce some sound energy from 40Hz to 20kHz. By far the best dynamic microphone in terms of the frequency response was the Behringer XM8500 Ultravoice unit. It even surpassed my Shure SM58 and a Sennheiser e845 that I also have in my small collection. These mics can be purchased for around ?20 and therefore represent excellent value for money. I bought five of them, including small boom stands and balanced cables from Allan Gordon. The Behringer XM2000S has exactly the same dynamic capsule and is equally as good."
IMATE LI NA OVO NEKI KOMENTAR!!!:confused:
Sta mislite o tome. Pa ako je tako onda je varijanta XM8500 daleko povoljnija, to moze biti korisno ako niste pri vecoj kinti, ili samo dobar EPP (reklama).
Evo tekstova:
Prvi tester kaze:
The next thing I tried was comparing it to a Shure SM58. I swapped from mic to mic and asked the crowd which they preferred. Those who could tell the difference preferred the XM8500! There wasn't a lot in it. The XM8500 definitely had a little more bottom end and perhaps wasn't quite as bright as the SM58. I would say that the XM8500 has a flatter frequency response than the SM58. The SM58 rolls off a bit of the bottom end and has a little presence boost. The XM8500 was also slightly louder and needed less gain on the mixer than the SM58
After comparing it with the Shure SM58, I pulled out my Shure Beta58 - my usual stage mic. The Beta58 was brighter (as I would have expected) but one didn't sound better than the other - they were just different. The crowd were divided between which sounded better. I guess it's just down to personal preference!
The final test was to have four XM8500s plugged in simultaneously. I ran the whole workshop on the Behringer mics. One thing I noticed was that they didn't feedback easily - certainly less than the SM58s I use. This mic was surely too good to be true!
Drugi tester kaze:
"I also tested the microphones I owned by comparing them with a B&K reference condenser microphone, and since I didn't have access to an anechoic chamber, I had to resort to testing them in my garden. It was the closest environment that I could get to an acoustic-free field, although my neighbours must have been puzzled at the pink noise wafting through the air. Still, it was great fun testing these microphones, which I did by looking at the transfer function between the reference B&K mic and my own microphones.
"The two mikes have to be placed as close as possible to each other with pink noise blasted at them from a hi-fi speaker, which is positioned about one meter away. In this way, the frequency response of the loudspeaker enclosure doesn't matter, providing that it can reproduce some sound energy from 40Hz to 20kHz. By far the best dynamic microphone in terms of the frequency response was the Behringer XM8500 Ultravoice unit. It even surpassed my Shure SM58 and a Sennheiser e845 that I also have in my small collection. These mics can be purchased for around ?20 and therefore represent excellent value for money. I bought five of them, including small boom stands and balanced cables from Allan Gordon. The Behringer XM2000S has exactly the same dynamic capsule and is equally as good."
IMATE LI NA OVO NEKI KOMENTAR!!!:confused: