Go Back   Rumski Forum > Studijska tehnika i instrumenti > Audio Software

Audio Software VST, DX, AU.... plug-in instrumenti i efekti, modularni sintovi i dizajn modularne sinteze, semplovanje, semplovi i sample libraries diskusije, koje sekvencere, editore, plug-inse koristite. Da li je bolji Sonar ili Cubase? Sound Forge ili WaveLab?..

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2009, 11:52 PM   #1
awacs
VIP Member
 
awacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zemun
Posts: 4,893
Default Re: Windows 7 u audio produkciji

Quote:
Originally Posted by kejkz View Post
Kralj je mrtav, zivela revolucija!
...iz pijeska vire krunisane glave,
što to rade - prde u prašinu

Pozdrav,

Vasa
__________________
TEHNIKA NARODU!
awacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:26 AM   #2
LACKY
Pro Member
 
LACKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,068
Default Re: Windows 7 u audio produkciji

Da i dodjosmo do sustine. Cemu tema, kada su svi doneli zakljucke i pre nego je otvorena!
Sto je sigurno, sigurno. Rece casna sestra i navuce kurton na svecu!
LACKY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 12:39 AM   #3
awacs
VIP Member
 
awacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zemun
Posts: 4,893
Default Re: Windows 7 u audio produkciji

Tako nekako. Mada sam se lično nadao da će me neko ubediti u suprotno. Kao - ASIO drajveri su skoro pa nepotrebni, po?to je latencija sistema skoro pa eliminisana, i tako te stvari.... Kad ono - Sloboda vodi Narod u ?ezdeset četiri bita....

Pozdrav,

Vasa
__________________
TEHNIKA NARODU!
awacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 06:30 AM   #4
LACKY
Pro Member
 
LACKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,068
Default Re: Windows 7 u audio produkciji

Pa gde to netreba ASIO?
Naravno da je korist, kao i pod OSX-m, kada menjas bufer (ili ti latenciju karte) skoro da uopste ne utice na potrosnju CPU-a (u 32-bitnoj verziji koja ipak radi u emulatig modu). A sa 64-bitnom verzijom (recimo) Nuenda nema nikakve razlike. Znaci stavis bufer na 64 pa posle na 1024 i potrosnja je ista. A probaj to pod XP-om.
Eto recimo jedna sitnica.
LACKY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:53 AM   #5
awacs
VIP Member
 
awacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zemun
Posts: 4,893
Default Re: Windows 7 u audio produkciji

Quote:
Originally Posted by LACKY View Post
Naravno da je korist, kao i pod OSX-m, kada menjas bufer (ili ti latenciju karte) skoro da uopste ne utice na potrosnju CPU-a (u 32-bitnoj verziji koja ipak radi u emulatig modu). A sa 64-bitnom verzijom (recimo) Nuenda nema nikakve razlike. Znaci stavis bufer na 64 pa posle na 1024 i potrosnja je ista. A probaj to pod XP-om.
Eto recimo jedna sitnica.
Pa tako reci, brate slatki

Pozdrav,

Vasa
__________________
TEHNIKA NARODU!
awacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Da li postoji neki Audio Meter nalik na Pingin Audio Meter ali da radi na Windows 7?? HM Produciton Audio Software 0 30-10-2009 11:37 AM
Microsoft Windows XP Pro Digital Audio Workstation Edition Danny Lou Audio Software 19 18-12-2008 04:08 AM
Audio Drajveri (MS Windows, OS X) kejkz Audio Software 3 28-06-2007 05:09 PM
:: Audio Ease Altiverb na Windows XP :: lesha Audio Software 13 22-06-2006 12:51 PM
Termini u produkciji Lag Tutorijali 14 14-02-2006 01:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors