Go Back   Rumski Forum > Aktivnosti > Razno
Reload this Page FLAC vs. Wav
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Razno pricajte o svemu ostalom vezano za muziku i PC produkciju, predstavite sebe, svoj band, also speak in english about pro audio production...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2008, 09:43 AM   #1
boggy
Moderator
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Beograd
Posts: 6,200
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by kejkz View Post
Zamislite flac kao zip za wavove, i to vam je to. Nema gubitka informacija, a mozete ih slusati u realnom vremenu. Jedina mana flac-a kao standarda je sto ne podrzava float formate, tako da mozete koristiti samo "obicne" 24bit fajlove, ali ne i 32-bitne, kakve izbacuje dosta softvera.
a jel podrzava 32bit integer?


pozdrav

bogi
__________________
@Facebook
@Instagram
Email: boggy@myroom-acoustics.com

--"We can never see past the choices we don't understand." (Oracle, The Matrix Reloaded)
boggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:07 AM   #2
dexyco
Pro Member
 
dexyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SD/NI
Posts: 903
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesha
nisi u pravu. procitaj originalni tekst na engleskom ponovo.
ovo je lossless, a ne lossy kompresija.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keks
Zamislite flac kao zip za wavove, i to vam je to. Nema gubitka informacija, a mozete ih slusati u realnom vremenu. Jedina mana flac-a kao standarda je sto ne podrzava float formate, tako da mozete koristiti samo "obicne" 24bit fajlove, ali ne i 32-bitne, kakve izbacuje dosta softvera.
Aha, to je ta kvaka, sorry... Ali to opet znaci debele gubitke na performansama?
__________________
Ipak, sta kog vraga ja znam, imam tek 20, jos uvek nisam nista konkretno uradio u muzici, i pijem mleko skoro svakog dana...
dexyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:12 AM   #3
boggy
Moderator
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Beograd
Posts: 6,200
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexyco View Post
Aha, to je ta kvaka, sorry... Ali to opet znaci debele gubitke na performansama?
o kakvim performansama pricas?

pozdrav

bogi
__________________
@Facebook
@Instagram
Email: boggy@myroom-acoustics.com

--"We can never see past the choices we don't understand." (Oracle, The Matrix Reloaded)
boggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:46 AM   #4
dexyco
Pro Member
 
dexyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SD/NI
Posts: 903
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Pa sistem to mora da rekompresuje u real time-u i salje zvucnoj, zar ne? Pakujes ti to lepo u finu kompresiju bez gubitaka, ali dekoder, kad ti preslusavas jede cpu kao pop Spira krofne, ili mozda i ne bas?
__________________
Ipak, sta kog vraga ja znam, imam tek 20, jos uvek nisam nista konkretno uradio u muzici, i pijem mleko skoro svakog dana...
dexyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:52 AM   #5
kejkz
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,210
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Ma ne brini, ne jede bas toliko, cak ima audio programa koji snimaju flac fajlove u realnom vremenu, i to multikanalno. Reaper mislim da je jedan od njih, i mozda tracktion, mada nisam siguran za njega, zaboravio sam.
kejkz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 11:54 AM   #6
dexyco
Pro Member
 
dexyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SD/NI
Posts: 903
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keks
gubi se na performansama, ali nije strasno, vise gubis dekodovanjem mp3 fajla nego flac-a ili bilo kog loseless formata

E pa ako imas kompjuter koji ne moze da dekoduje flac fajl u realnom vremenu, baci ga slobodno kroz prozor, neko ce ga docekati na grudi
Aha, predpostavio sam da manje uzima od lossy, znaci dodjosmo mi do zakljucka - koristiti PLAC i uzivati...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitch
ima nesto lepo www.red.com
Zanimljivo, procesljacu malo detaljnije kasnije...
__________________
Ipak, sta kog vraga ja znam, imam tek 20, jos uvek nisam nista konkretno uradio u muzici, i pijem mleko skoro svakog dana...
dexyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 12:00 PM   #7
dexyco
Pro Member
 
dexyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SD/NI
Posts: 903
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
A sta je sa kompatabilnosti sa klasicnim sekvencerima Nuendo, Cubase? Radi li tamo dobro, ima li podrsku za sve zasta ima i wav? Ako da, onda stvarno treba koristiti PLAC umesto WAV-a...
__________________
Ipak, sta kog vraga ja znam, imam tek 20, jos uvek nisam nista konkretno uradio u muzici, i pijem mleko skoro svakog dana...
dexyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 12:05 PM   #8
boggy
Moderator
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Beograd
Posts: 6,200
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexyco View Post
...Ako da, onda stvarno treba koristiti PLAC umesto WAV-a...
FLAC.. b'e!

pozdrav

bogi
__________________
@Facebook
@Instagram
Email: boggy@myroom-acoustics.com

--"We can never see past the choices we don't understand." (Oracle, The Matrix Reloaded)
boggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 12:34 PM   #9
kejkz
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,210
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexyco View Post
A sta je sa kompatabilnosti sa klasicnim sekvencerima Nuendo, Cubase? Radi li tamo dobro, ima li podrsku za sve zasta ima i wav? Ako da, onda stvarno treba koristiti PLAC umesto WAV-a...
Plac, plac, moraju da se plaknu malo ti wavovi

Nema podrske u major hostovima, mozda ima wavelab, mada nisam siguran, ima Steiny svoj loseless format.
kejkz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 02:34 PM   #10
alektom
Member
 
alektom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beograd
Posts: 95
Default Re: FLAC vs. Wav
Da zakljucimo, programi prilikom pustanja FLac-a ga dekodiraju u wav u real time? Jesam li dobro shvatio?
alektom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Rumski.com - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors